Volt-VAR Control in Smart Grids Explained

Volt-VAR Control in Smart Grids Explained

Volt-VAR Control (VVC) is essential for managing voltage levels and reactive power in modern power grids. It ensures electricity is delivered efficiently, reduces energy losses, and supports renewable energy integration. Here's a quick breakdown of the three main VVC methods:

  • Local Control Systems: Simple and cost-effective, these operate independently to manage voltage and load but lack grid-wide optimization.
  • Coordinated Control Systems: Use network-wide data to improve efficiency, balance loads, and integrate renewables, but require advanced infrastructure.
  • Inverter-Based Systems: Ideal for grids with high renewable energy, offering precise, dynamic voltage control but with higher complexity and costs.

Quick Comparison

Method Voltage Regulation Load Balancing Renewable Integration Complexity
Local Control Basic Limited Minimal Low
Coordinated Control Network-wide optimization Strong Good Moderate
Inverter-Based Precise and dynamic Advanced bidirectional Excellent High

Each method has its strengths and trade-offs. Choosing the right one depends on your grid's needs, renewable energy goals, and budget. For modern grids with significant renewable energy penetration, inverter-based systems are often the best choice.

Volt/Var Optimization in Distribution Systems with Distributed Energy Resources Penetration Webinar

1. Local Control Systems

Local control systems play a key role in managing Volt-VAR control within smart grids. These systems operate autonomously, making real-time decisions based solely on local measurements at specific grid connection points. This independence is particularly valuable when communication networks are disrupted or delayed.

Voltage Regulation

One of the primary functions of local control systems is rapid response to voltage fluctuations. They achieve this through mechanisms like reactive power control in distributed generation units. For example, solar inverters and smart inverters can automatically adjust their reactive power output based on local voltage readings, helping to stabilize the grid efficiently.

A real-world example of this is Hawaiian Electric's work at the Keolu substation on O'ahu. With residential solar PV penetration exceeding 90% (roughly 4.3 MW), the utility installed 61 low-voltage control devices. These devices improved voltage regulation by nearly 50%, enabling operators to lower the Load Tap Changer voltage from 122 V to 119.5 V.

"Voltage regulation is considered one of the main operational challenges that accompany high penetration levels of renewable-based DGs", said Maher Azzouz from the University of Windsor.

Smart inverters typically operate with ±3% deadbands and ±3% slopes in their volt-var curves to maintain grid stability. When reactive power adjustments aren’t enough, local systems may resort to active power curtailment, temporarily reducing generation to prevent overvoltage conditions. This quick adaptability also supports better local load management.

Load Balancing

Local control systems are also vital for managing loads across the grid. By making independent decisions, these systems can adjust loads in real time. For instance, electric vehicle charging stations can modify charging rates based on local voltage levels, reducing stress on the grid during peak demand. While this distributed decision-making helps balance the grid, it can sometimes lead to conflicting actions among controllers, causing inefficiencies in specific areas.

Renewable Integration

Integrating renewable energy sources like wind and solar presents unique challenges due to their variability. Local control systems must adapt to sudden changes, such as shifts in wind speed or cloud cover, without relying on advanced coordination. Hawaiian Electric’s successful deployment of local voltage control devices allowed PV penetration to increase from 90% to 125%, boosting the grid's renewable hosting capacity by over one-third - all without curtailing generation. This demonstrates how local systems can accommodate higher levels of renewables.

In medium and low-voltage branches, where high R/X ratios are common, additional reactive power support is often needed to manage distributed solar and wind resources effectively.

Operational Complexity

Compared to centralized systems, local control systems simplify operations by requiring minimal communication infrastructure and reducing computational demands on utility control centers. This simplicity lowers implementation costs and reduces vulnerability to communication failures. However, operating without full grid information can lead to uncoordinated actions, such as adjacent controllers working independently and causing inefficient oscillations.

Despite these challenges, local control systems are indispensable for maintaining grid flexibility and resilience. As power grids evolve into networks with millions of controllable nodes, local systems will remain essential for ensuring basic grid functions, especially when higher-level coordination systems encounter issues. Their ability to operate independently becomes particularly crucial during extreme weather events or cyberattacks, where reliable local voltage regulation can prevent equipment damage and service disruptions.

2. Coordinated Control Systems

Coordinated control systems take grid management to the next level by using network-wide data to improve stability and efficiency. Unlike local systems that operate independently at specific points, these systems work across multiple nodes, creating a more unified and optimized approach to managing voltage and load. This kind of collaboration is becoming increasingly important as grids incorporate more renewable energy sources and distributed energy resources (DERs).

Voltage Regulation

One of the standout features of coordinated control systems is their ability to maintain voltage levels within ANSI standards across the entire grid. They use centralized Volt/VAR control (VVC) strategies that synchronize utility VVC tools with smart inverters, ensuring seamless operation throughout the distribution network. For example, a study using a modified IEEE 34-node system showed that coordinated VVC schemes can completely eliminate overvoltage and undervoltage problems.

Traditional methods like capacitor banks, load tap changers, and voltage regulators see much less use under coordinated control. These systems reduce the reliance on traditional regulation methods by up to 90% compared to local control and 70% compared to fixed Volt-VAR curves. Additionally, coordinated systems significantly cut down on active power curtailment for distributed generators. This improved voltage regulation naturally supports better load balancing, which is discussed next.

Load Balancing

Balancing loads across DERs is another key strength of coordinated control systems. By centralizing the control of DERs, these systems can significantly reduce peak loads - projections estimate an 18% reduction by 2050. Without coordination, 81% of transformers could face overloading by 2050, but with centralized control, that number drops to just 28%.

Coordinated systems also ensure power demand is evenly distributed across all three phases in the distribution network. This prevents uneven loading and reduces overall system losses. Advanced frameworks using online feedback optimization further enhance load balancing by managing DERs with complex, time-dependent interactions. Dividing control tasks between global and local controllers also helps lower energy costs and optimize energy arbitrage. These improvements lay the groundwork for better integration of renewable energy, as detailed below.

Renewable Integration

Coordinated control systems are highly effective at integrating renewable energy sources. By combining reactive power and tap control, they can increase hosting capacity by 61.65% while reducing energy losses by 9.35%. This is especially important for handling the unpredictable nature of renewable energy and the variable power demands of plug-in electric vehicles. Coordinated systems can address these fluctuations efficiently, potentially eliminating 52% of overloaded transformers and 10% of nodes with voltage violations. They also reduce the need for costly infrastructure like dedicated power electronics and battery energy storage at the substation level.

Operational Complexity

While the benefits of coordinated control systems are undeniable, they do come with challenges. Implementing these advanced systems often means dealing with aging infrastructure that may not support the required technology. The diversity of proprietary technologies creates interoperability issues, and the absence of universal standards complicates communication protocols, data formats, and cybersecurity measures.

Cybersecurity is a particularly pressing concern. As connectivity and data sharing increase, so do the risks of cyberattacks. On top of that, creating fair market mechanisms for coordinated control requires rethinking how transmission charges and distribution fees are structured to ensure fair competition for smaller, distributed energy resources. These hurdles highlight the need for significant regulatory changes as the grid transitions to a decentralized, digitally managed model.

sbb-itb-501186b

3. Inverter-Based Control Systems

Inverter-based control systems represent a cutting-edge approach to managing modern power grids. These systems use power inverters to convert direct current (DC) from renewable sources, like solar panels, into alternating current (AC) suitable for the grid. What sets them apart from traditional mechanical systems is their software-driven control, which allows for quick and precise responses to changing grid conditions.

The transition to inverter-based systems is gaining momentum across the United States. In 2023, clean energy sources accounted for about 41% of the nation’s electricity, with wind and solar alone contributing over 16%. Globally, renewable energy capacity grew by 6% in 2021, reaching 295 GW - a clear indication of the growing reliance on these systems to stabilize grids.

Voltage Regulation

One of the standout features of smart inverters is their ability to regulate voltage dynamically. By providing fast reactive power compensation, they reduce the strain on traditional equipment like tap changers and capacitor banks. This is particularly useful in grids with high levels of renewable energy, where voltage can fluctuate rapidly.

Unlike traditional methods that address voltage issues reactively, inverter-based systems use advanced algorithms to predict and prevent problems before they arise. These algorithms go beyond simple reactive power–voltage droop curves, optimizing voltage across multiple devices rather than relying on isolated adjustments.

Smart inverters also respond quickly to maintain voltage within ANSI standards, even as renewable energy output fluctuates throughout the day due to factors like passing clouds or changing wind speeds. This precise control not only stabilizes the grid but also lays the groundwork for better load management.

Load Balancing

Inverter-based resources (IBRs) play a crucial role in balancing grid loads. They can store energy during periods of low demand and release it during peak times, reducing stress on the grid. This bidirectional capability is becoming increasingly important as more electric vehicles and battery storage systems connect to the grid.

These inverters are designed to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, such as frequency regulation, voltage control, and oscillation damping. This allows them to adjust their output dynamically to match changing grid conditions. Their rapid response helps prevent issues like voltage dips or frequency deviations, ensuring smoother grid operations.

Renewable Integration

Inverter-based systems are also vital for integrating renewable energy into the grid. Acting as a bridge between renewable sources and traditional grid infrastructure, these systems use advanced software to adapt to changes in weather and energy production.

One major challenge they address is the lack of mechanical inertia in renewable energy sources. Unlike traditional generators, which have high mechanical inertia to stabilize grid frequency, IBRs provide little to no inherent inertia. To compensate, inverters can simulate "virtual inertia" by quickly injecting or absorbing power in response to frequency changes.

Additionally, advanced inverter controls ensure systems can handle disturbances. Features like fault ride-through and active voltage support allow inverters to stay connected during grid disruptions, preventing further instability.

Operational Complexity

While inverter-based systems bring numerous benefits, they also introduce new challenges. Their software-driven flexibility requires thorough testing and coordination to ensure stable grid interactions. The fundamental differences between inverter-based systems and traditional generators add another layer of complexity.

For instance, grid-following (GFL) inverters operate by injecting current based on existing grid voltage and frequency, whereas grid-forming (GFM) inverters create their own voltage and frequency, making them suitable for weaker grids. The table below highlights these differences:

Control Type Primary Function Grid Requirements Control Complexity
Grid-Following (GFL) Inject scheduled power Requires stable voltage Simpler, current-based
Grid-Forming (GFM) Set voltage and frequency Operates in weak grids More complex, voltage-based
Traditional Generators Mechanical synchronization Natural grid support Simpler mechanical control

As the share of IBRs grows, coordination challenges increase. Each inverter must communicate with others to avoid conflicts and maintain system stability. Additionally, their fault response capabilities differ significantly from traditional generators. For example, while synchronous generators can provide up to seven times their rated current during short-circuit events, grid-forming inverters typically offer only about 20% of their rated current. This discrepancy requires careful planning to ensure protection systems function effectively.

These complexities highlight the ongoing evolution of grid control strategies. For those upgrading their infrastructure, Electrical Trader offers a range of advanced components and equipment to support modern Volt-VAR control systems.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Each Volt-VAR control method comes with its own set of strengths and limitations, making it essential for utilities to weigh these trade-offs carefully when deciding on the best approach for their smart grid operations. Let’s break down the key aspects of each system.

Local control systems are straightforward and easy to implement. They require minimal communication infrastructure and can function independently, which makes them particularly reliable during network outages. However, their simplicity comes at a cost - these systems operate in isolation, which limits their ability to optimize performance across the entire grid. While they’re dependable for basic tasks, they lack the advanced capabilities offered by more integrated systems like coordinated or inverter-based control.

Coordinated control systems take grid management to the next level by involving distributed energy resources (DERs) in voltage regulation. Instead of relying solely on centralized equipment, these systems distribute responsibilities across the network, improving overall efficiency and resilience. They also enhance the integration of renewable energy sources. That said, these benefits come with added complexity in system design and maintenance, which can be a hurdle for some utilities.

Inverter-based control systems are particularly well-suited for modern grids with a high share of renewable energy. Smart inverters in these systems come equipped with advanced functionalities like reactive power control and precise voltage regulation. They also provide dynamic support for grid stability, addressing challenges such as the reduced inertia associated with renewables. The growing importance of these systems is underscored by the rapid rise in renewable energy’s share of global electricity output - from 2.64% in 2004 to 11.4% by 2019. However, their advanced capabilities come with higher operational complexity and upfront costs.

Control Method Voltage Regulation Load Balancing Renewable Integration Operational Complexity
Local Control Good for basic tasks Limited capability Minimal support Low
Coordinated Control Strong across network Distributed capabilities Good DER integration Moderate
Inverter-Based Control Dynamic and precise Advanced bidirectional control Excellent renewable support High

When it comes to costs, local control systems are the most budget-friendly upfront, although additional equipment may be necessary for full grid coverage. Coordinated systems require moderate investment in communication networks and control software. Inverter-based systems, while demanding the highest initial investment and advanced communication infrastructure, offer unparalleled dynamic control and renewable integration.

For utilities planning upgrades, the choice of control method depends heavily on the grid's specific needs and long-term goals. For regions with significant renewable energy penetration, inverter-based systems are often the most effective. On the other hand, areas with stable, traditional energy generation might find coordinated control systems more aligned with their requirements. This comparison provides a foundation for making informed decisions to enhance smart grid performance.

Conclusion

Choosing the right Volt-VAR control method hinges on your current operational needs and long-term goals. Each approach - local, coordinated, or inverter-based - comes with its own strengths and trade-offs, as outlined earlier.

Local control systems are ideal for utilities prioritizing simplicity and reliability with minimal upfront costs. However, they might fall short when grid-wide performance and optimization become more critical. Coordinated control systems, on the other hand, provide better network-wide performance, especially for utilities dealing with moderate levels of distributed energy resources (DERs). For example, a Queensland University study highlighted how coordinated schemes can reduce equipment wear while maintaining stable grid voltage. Meanwhile, inverter-based control systems are increasingly vital as the grid integrates more renewable energy sources. Their dynamic, bidirectional control and precise voltage regulation make them a go-to option for modern grids.

When deciding on a strategy, keep these key factors in mind:

  • DER penetration and future plans: Understand your current levels of distributed energy and how much renewable energy you aim to integrate in the future.
  • Budget and infrastructure: Advanced systems like coordinated and inverter-based controls require more initial investment but can yield greater savings over time.

While local control systems may offer the lowest initial costs, advanced solutions like coordinated and inverter-based systems can lead to long-term savings by reducing losses and deferring infrastructure upgrades. For example, model-based volt/VAR optimization has been shown to cut costs by minimizing losses and delaying the need for new infrastructure investments.

For many utilities, a hybrid approach - combining traditional devices with modern DER controls - offers the best of both worlds. This strategy leverages centralized optimization for slower grid adjustments while using distributed control for quick responses. Such flexibility helps utilities manage growing grid complexity while ensuring reliability and cost efficiency.

Ultimately, success lies in aligning your Volt-VAR control method with your grid’s current conditions and future renewable energy goals. Whether you opt for local, coordinated, or inverter-based control, your strategy should support today’s operational needs while preparing for tomorrow’s energy challenges.

FAQs

How do Volt-VAR control methods help integrate renewable energy into smart grids?

Volt-VAR control methods are essential for integrating renewable energy into smart grids, as they actively manage voltage levels and reactive power to maintain stability. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar often experience fluctuations in power generation, and these controls help ensure the grid stays reliable despite these variations.

By fine-tuning voltage and cutting down reactive power losses in real time, Volt-VAR strategies enhance power quality and make it easier for the grid to accommodate more renewable energy. This real-time adjustment ensures that distributed energy sources can blend smoothly into the existing grid infrastructure, keeping performance steady and reducing the risk of disruptions.

What are the pros and cons of using local versus coordinated control systems in smart grids?

The decision to use local control systems or coordinated control systems in smart grids hinges on the grid's specific requirements and operational priorities.

Local control systems function independently within a designated area. Their strength lies in their ability to react quickly to local issues, such as voltage fluctuations or sudden load changes, ensuring improved reliability in real time. However, they often fall short in optimizing the grid's overall performance, which can result in inefficiencies, particularly in larger, interconnected networks.

In contrast, coordinated control systems manage multiple local controllers using either centralized or distributed approaches. These systems are particularly effective at optimizing the grid as a whole, handling tasks like voltage regulation, load balancing, and integrating renewable energy sources. That said, they demand advanced communication infrastructure and are typically more complex to implement and maintain.

Choosing between these systems requires weighing the importance of quick, localized responses against the advantages of system-wide efficiency and optimization.

Why are inverter-based systems ideal for grids with high levels of renewable energy, even though they are more complex and expensive?

Inverter-based systems play a key role in power grids that rely heavily on renewable energy. Their grid-forming capabilities help stabilize voltage and frequency, which is crucial as traditional sources of system inertia decline. These systems respond rapidly to grid changes, ensuring smooth and reliable operation.

Though they come with higher complexity and initial costs, inverter-based systems bring significant benefits. They boost grid flexibility and resilience, making it easier to incorporate more renewable energy sources. Additionally, they improve fault response and enhance overall system reliability - essential features for today's renewable-focused power grids.

Related posts

 

Back to blog