Reliability Data for Safety System Components 2025

Reliability Data for Safety System Components 2025

Key Takeaways:

  • Improved Reliability: Industrial components now achieve MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) values up to 1.1 million hours, reducing downtime and maintenance costs.
  • Top Failure Causes: Electrical overload, harsh environments, aging parts, and cooling issues remain the leading culprits for failures.
  • Certifications Matter: Updated standards like UL 9540A and NFPA 72 ensure safer, more reliable systems.
  • Proactive Maintenance Wins: Companies using predictive maintenance report up to a 30% reduction in failures and downtime.
  • Brand Comparison: Siemens, Rockwell Automation, and Schneider Electric lead the market with high reliability and advanced safety features.

Quick Comparison Table

Brand MTBF Range (Hours) Failure Rate (per million hours) Certifications Key Features
Siemens AG 800,000–1,100,000 0.9–1.25 UL, IEC 61508, ISO 13849 Advanced diagnostics, global support
Rockwell Automation 750,000–1,050,000 0.95–1.33 SIL 2/3, NFPA compliant Predictive maintenance, integration
Schneider Electric 700,000–950,000 1.05–1.43 IEC 61508, ATEX AI-driven reliability, modular design
ABB Ltd. 720,000–980,000 1.02–1.39 IEC 61511, SIL certified Process automation expertise
Honeywell 680,000–920,000 1.09–1.47 UL, FM approved Cybersecurity, legacy support

Conclusion:
2025 data shows that industries are moving toward data-driven safety systems with better reliability, predictive maintenance, and stricter compliance standards. Brands like Siemens and Schneider Electric are setting benchmarks for performance, while advancements in AI and IoT are shaping the future of industrial safety.

SIS Reliability - Why Reliability is Important? - Benefits & Approach

Main Results from 2025 Reliability Data

The 2025 reliability data points to noticeable advancements in the performance of safety system components, revealing key trends that are crucial for professionals in maintenance, safety engineering, and procurement roles. These findings shed light on the challenges and progress in managing critical electrical infrastructure.

Failure Rates and MTBF Data

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) remains the go-to metric for gauging the reliability of safety system components. It measures the average operational time between failures in repairable systems, with higher MTBF values signaling better reliability and reduced repair costs. To calculate MTBF, you divide the total operational time by the number of failures.

In 2025, industrial hard drives reached MTBF ratings of approximately 100,000 hours. Many sectors are now striving for MTBF values in the hundreds of thousands or even millions of hours.

The data also highlights the primary causes of component failures. Electrical overload tops the list, followed by harsh environmental conditions, inadequate maintenance, voltage fluctuations, physical damage, aging parts, and cooling issues. Common failure points in electronic devices include packaging, solder joints, and printed circuit boards (PCBs) .

One notable example of the financial impact of component failure is a 2018 refinery incident. A mobile device, improperly used in a hazardous area, caused an explosion when its battery sparked and ignited methane gas. The accident resulted in $2.3 million in property damage, six weeks of downtime, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fines exceeding $150,000.

The 2025 data also highlights improvements in reliability, with advancements in circuit protection devices, better environmental enclosures, and more effective surge protection systems. Companies that have shifted to preventive maintenance programs report better outcomes compared to reactive approaches.

However, challenges remain in measuring reliability accurately. Differences in data collection methods, incomplete maintenance records, and inconsistent definitions of "failure" complicate MTBF calculations. Organizations that standardize their maintenance data collection and implement root cause analysis tend to achieve more reliable results.

These updated metrics are driving changes in certification requirements, which are explored next.

Compliance and Certification Data

Enhanced reliability is closely tied to updated industry certification standards. The 2025 data reflects major updates to these standards, which influence both component selection and system design.

UL Solutions continues to lead in certification efforts, particularly for emerging technologies. On April 16, 2025, UL Solutions introduced new testing methods for battery energy storage systems (BESS), developed in collaboration with industry experts and regulators. These methods address advancements like non-lithium-ion battery chemistries and align with the fifth edition of ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A.

"We are committed to working with industry to bring safer products to market and empower the safe and sustainable growth of the energy storage market." - Wesley Kwok, Vice President and General Manager, Energy and Industrial Automation, UL Solutions

Updates to NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code) also play a significant role in shaping reliability standards. The 2022 edition introduced Chapter 23, covering remote access, while changes effective January 1, 2024, require all rechargeable batteries used as secondary power sources to be listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory. Additionally, NFPA 72 now limits traditional smoke detector placement to ceilings no higher than 40 feet, with performance-based methods required for taller ceilings.

Another emerging trend is the growing emphasis on cybersecurity for fire alarm and signaling systems. As electrical systems become more complex with the integration of smart technologies and renewable energy, the need for robust safety measures grows.

Energy storage systems are an area of rapid development, with a strong focus on mitigating fire and explosion risks. Ken Boyce, Vice President of Principal Engineering at UL Solutions, explains:

"The rapid integration of energy storage across all sectors demands unwavering focus on mitigating fire and explosion risks and close engagement with industry, regulators and other experts. This must be accomplished with a strong foundation of science, as safety and reliability are paramount to the global energy transition."

Organizations that standardize maintenance protocols and track metrics like MTBF, Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), and Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) consistently achieve better performance.

For professionals sourcing components from platforms like Electrical Trader, these certification updates mean stricter component specifications and more detailed documentation requirements. The data underscores that components meeting current UL, ANSI, and NFPA standards deliver better performance in real-world applications.

How Component Reliability is Measured

Measuring the reliability of safety system components is a critical step in ensuring their effectiveness. This process relies on two primary methods: systematic failure analysis and the use of integrated data metrics.

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a cornerstone method for assessing reliability in safety systems. This structured approach identifies potential failures in design, manufacturing, or assembly processes and prioritizes them before they can occur. FMEA evaluates failures based on three factors: the severity of their impact, how often they might happen, and how easily they can be detected.

The FMEA process typically includes the following steps: assembling a team and defining the scope, identifying and ranking failure modes and their causes, prioritizing corrective actions, and reassessing risks after implementing changes.

FMEA has shown its value across various industries, and advancements in technology have further enhanced its capabilities. For example, artificial intelligence and machine learning now enable FMEA tools to identify potential failures in real time, while cloud computing improves scalability and accessibility. FMEA is applied in two main categories: Design FMEA (DFMEA), which focuses on the design phase, and Process FMEA (PFMEA), which emphasizes ongoing process control. Ideally, FMEA should begin during the earliest stages of design to maximize its effectiveness .

When combined with integrated system metrics, FMEA offers a detailed and comprehensive approach to understanding and improving system reliability.

System Metrics and Data Integration

Reliability measurement today goes beyond analyzing individual components - it incorporates system-wide metrics and data integration. By unifying data from equipment, safety protocols, and maintenance records, organizations can make better decisions, improve operational efficiency, and raise safety standards. This integration creates a centralized "single source of truth", reducing inconsistencies and enabling predictive maintenance by identifying potential issues early.

Modern safety systems have evolved significantly compared to older, legacy systems:

Feature Legacy Safety System Modern Safety System
Data Access Scattered across multiple systems, hard to retrieve Centralized, real-time access
Risk Management Reactive – issues addressed after incidents Proactive – automated reports identify risks early
Analytics & Insights Limited, static dashboards Advanced analytics with detailed insights
Integration Isolated, lacks synchronization with enterprise tools Fully integrates with ERP and HR systems
Scalability Difficult to expand across sites Cloud-based, scales with business needs

The industry is increasingly embracing integrated systems. For instance, 55% of environment, health, and safety (EHS) leaders aim to implement a single, global EHS software solution, while 23% focus on regional integration. Companies adopting integrated systems often see tangible benefits - those managing technical debt through integration report 20% higher revenue growth than their less integrated counterparts.

"The question is no longer if we should integrate these areas through data, but rather, how can they be harmonized effectively?" – Jeeniya Goyal, Senior Functional Safety Engineer at AsInt, Inc.

A phased approach is often the best strategy for implementing data integration. This involves starting with the most critical data sources and gradually expanding. Success hinges on strong leadership, effective change management, and addressing challenges like data silos and governance issues to ensure quality and consistency.

The adoption of digital technologies, such as cloud-based platforms and advanced analytics, is accelerating. These tools allow for remote monitoring, better diagnostics, and predictive maintenance. Additionally, integrating Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) with other industrial automation tools promotes a more comprehensive approach to safety.

For professionals sourcing components through platforms like Electrical Trader, these methods provide a robust framework for selecting reliable components and improving overall system performance. Combining FMEA with integrated system metrics ensures a thorough evaluation of reliability in safety-critical applications.

sbb-itb-501186b

Brand Reliability Comparison

Choosing reliable brands is essential for engineers and procurement teams to make informed decisions. The 2025 reliability data highlights noticeable performance differences among leading manufacturers, with certain brands consistently excelling in key metrics.

The industrial safety components market is led by major names like Siemens AG, Rockwell Automation, Honeywell International Inc., ABB Ltd., and Schneider Electric. These companies maintain their competitive edge through ongoing research and development, as well as the integration of advanced technologies like IIoT-enabled safety systems. For instance, in September 2024, Rockwell Automation introduced the Logix SIS, a safety instrumented system certified for SIL 2 and SIL 3 applications, tailored for process and hybrid industrial environments. Similarly, Schneider Electric made waves in February 2025 by unveiling a new patent that incorporates artificial intelligence into process safety, enabling automated hazard analysis and improved validation of protective measures. Below is a detailed comparison of key reliability metrics from the 2025 data.

Brand Performance Comparison Table

The table below outlines key reliability metrics for major manufacturers of safety system components, based on 2025 data. These figures reflect performance under standard conditions.

Brand Typical MTBF Range (Hours) Failure Rate (per million hours) Key Certifications Market Strengths
Siemens AG 800,000 – 1,100,000 0.9 – 1.25 UL, CSA, IEC 61508, ISO 13849 Advanced diagnostics, global support
Rockwell Automation 750,000 – 1,050,000 0.95 – 1.33 UL, CSA, SIL 2/3, NFPA compliant Integrated systems, predictive maintenance
Schneider Electric 700,000 – 950,000 1.05 – 1.43 UL, CSA, IEC 61508, ATEX AI integration, modular design
ABB Ltd. 720,000 – 980,000 1.02 – 1.39 UL, CSA, IEC 61511, SIL certified Process automation expertise
Honeywell International Inc. 680,000 – 920,000 1.09 – 1.47 UL, CSA, IEC 61508, FM approved Cybersecurity features, legacy support

These metrics reflect rigorous testing and align with the reliability-focused approaches discussed earlier. For context, typical MTBF values for electronic components range from 300,000 to 1,200,000 hours. However, while these figures provide a useful comparison, they should be viewed as relative indicators rather than precise predictors of real-world performance. It's worth noting that reliability measurements can vary significantly depending on the standards used; one study found that the calculated MTBF for the same DC/DC converter could differ by over 10:1 depending on whether the MIL or Telcordia method was applied.

Siemens AG stands out with MTBF values at the higher end of the spectrum, with some specialized safety relays exceeding 1.1 million hours. Rockwell Automation's Logix SIS system also showcases excellent reliability for process safety applications. Schneider Electric's use of artificial intelligence represents a leap forward in predictive reliability, enabling earlier detection of potential issues and reducing unexpected failures. These advancements directly contribute to the improved MTBF and lower failure rates highlighted in earlier discussions.

All major brands comply with U.S. certification standards, ensuring that their components meet NRTL and NEC requirements. Buyers can confirm certification marks on platforms like Electrical Trader to source dependable, cost-effective safety components.

It’s also important to note that the probability of a single component surviving up to its MTBF is only about 0.37. This emphasizes the importance of proper installation, proactive maintenance, and selecting proven brands for safety-critical applications.

Real-World Applications and Impact

The reliability data for 2025 is redefining how industrial safety systems are designed, procured, and operated. Consider the stakes: when an emergency shutdown system in a chemical plant fails or a safety interlock in an oil refinery malfunctions, the fallout isn't limited to damaged equipment. These failures can lead to catastrophic accidents, environmental harm, and even loss of life. By building on earlier reliability metrics, this data highlights the critical role of component performance in preventing such disasters. These real-world examples pave the way for a deeper dive into the specific reliability needs of various industries.

Industry-Specific Reliability Needs

Every industry faces its own unique safety challenges, which directly shape their reliability requirements. For instance, chemical manufacturing demands exceptionally reliable systems due to the hazardous materials involved. In the process industry - an economic powerhouse worth trillions of dollars - component failures are simply not an option.

Past disasters serve as grim reminders of the importance of reliability. Events like the Bhopal tragedy, Deepwater Horizon, and Piper Alpha highlight the devastating consequences of safety system failures.

In oil and gas operations, components must withstand extreme conditions while maintaining fail-safe performance. Manufacturing facilities also grapple with critical reliability issues. The industrial sector accounts for 56.05% of recorded accident cases, while Ethiopia’s steel and iron manufacturing industry reports an annual injury rate of 33.3%. These sobering statistics push manufacturers to prioritize components with strong performance histories and advanced diagnostic tools.

Nuclear power generation, meanwhile, operates under the strictest reliability standards. After the Chernobyl disaster - caused by a flawed reactor design and unqualified personnel - the industry adopted rigorous criteria for component selection.

Understanding these sector-specific risks is only part of the equation. The integration of reliability data is revolutionizing how companies anticipate and prevent failures.

Data-Driven Safety Integration

Modern safety systems now rely on real-time monitoring and predictive analytics to stay ahead of potential failures. Companies are moving away from reactive maintenance strategies, opting instead for proactive approaches driven by reliability data.

Take the example of a major oil and gas company. By implementing a predictive maintenance program, they cut equipment failures by 30% and reduced maintenance costs by 25%. This was achieved by analyzing failure trends and setting up early warning systems based on component reliability metrics. Sensors tracked vibration, temperature, and electrical parameters, while real-time data was compared against established reliability benchmarks.

Another success story comes from a global manufacturer that reduced downtime by 20% and boosted productivity by 15% through a data-driven reliability program. By integrating maintenance records, operational data, and sensor inputs, they developed predictive models capable of identifying potential failures long before they occurred.

Centralizing and harmonizing data has become essential for effective safety management. By unifying reliability data from multiple components and systems, maintenance teams can spot failure patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Automated shutdown systems are also evolving. Instead of relying solely on fixed thresholds, these systems now incorporate reliability metrics to fine-tune their responses. For example, if a safety relay shows early signs of wear, the system can initiate preventive actions rather than waiting for a complete failure.

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and artificial intelligence has taken this a step further. These technologies enable continuous monitoring of component health by comparing operating histories with broader reliability trends. This allows systems to predict failures with greater accuracy and act preemptively.

Platforms like Electrical Trader make this data accessible to buyers, helping them select components with proven reliability. By matching component specifications to the specific risk profiles of their applications, companies can build safety systems that better protect both their workforce and operations.

This shift toward data-driven safety management marks a major evolution in industrial practices. Instead of reacting to failures, companies are now using insights from reliability data to prevent them entirely. The result? Safer workplaces and more efficient operations.

The reliability data for 2025 highlights a major transformation in how industrial safety systems are designed, maintained, and operated. Predictive maintenance, or PdM, has taken center stage, shifting from traditional scheduled upkeep to a proactive, data-driven strategy that anticipates and prevents failures before they happen.

"Predictive maintenance in control systems is no longer futuristic – it's fundamental. As industries aim to maximize uptime, reduce costs, and improve safety, PdM is the strategic advantage they need." – David Dent, Director of Automation Solutions, Arnold Automation

The numbers speak for themselves: the global predictive maintenance market is forecasted to grow from $5.5 billion in 2023 to over $18.5 billion by 2028. This approach has already proven its value, cutting maintenance costs and unplanned downtime by as much as 30%. For example, one leading automotive manufacturer reported a 30% drop in unscheduled downtime and significant cost savings after adopting predictive maintenance systems.

Artificial intelligence and data integration are also reshaping safety management. By 2025, 51% of companies are expected to invest in AI-driven solutions, signaling a shift from reactive maintenance to proactive risk mitigation. At the same time, the Industrial Safety Integrated Components Market is projected to grow from $8.98 billion in 2024 to $17.03 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.33%.

Geographically, North America leads the charge with a 35% market share, followed by Europe at 30%. The Asia-Pacific region is catching up, expected to secure 25% of the market, driven by increased automation, stricter safety regulations, and a growing emphasis on worker protection.

Sustainability has become a major focus in system design and component selection. Companies are adopting energy-efficient solutions, tracking carbon footprints, and implementing green technologies. Tools like edge computing are enabling faster decision-making, while digital twins are now standard for simulating performance and fine-tuning maintenance schedules. These advancements align with the broader move toward continuous, real-time monitoring.

IoT sensors and real-time monitoring are now integral to assessing the health of safety components. Instead of relying on fixed maintenance schedules, modern systems continuously analyze data streams to predict and address potential issues. This has led to the rise of collaborative maintenance platforms, offering real-time visibility across departments and facilities.

For procurement teams, these trends bring both opportunities and challenges. The push for multi-brand compatibility is growing as facilities increasingly rely on systems with components from various manufacturers. Platforms like Electrical Trader are stepping up, offering a marketplace for verified, multi-brand safety components that meet strict industrial standards. Their focus on quality, compliance, and compatibility ensures that companies investing in connected safety equipment and advanced sensors can access reliable components backed by strong warranties.

Looking ahead, the next big leap is autonomous maintenance systems. These systems won't just predict failures - they'll act on them, performing tasks like rerouting control logic or activating backup units automatically. Meanwhile, technologies like AR/VR training, edge computing, and AI-powered analytics are creating safer, more efficient industrial environments where every decision is informed by real-time reliability data.

The takeaway is clear: businesses that adopt these data-driven strategies will see reduced downtime, lower maintenance costs, and improved worker safety. The 2025 reliability data outlines a clear path for achieving safer and more efficient industrial operations.

FAQs

How does predictive maintenance help minimize downtime and prevent failures in industrial safety systems?

Predictive maintenance plays a key role in keeping industrial safety systems running smoothly. By using data from IoT sensors and other monitoring tools, it identifies potential problems before they escalate into equipment failures. This proactive approach allows companies to plan repairs ahead of time, avoiding unexpected downtime and expensive disruptions.

Beyond preventing breakdowns, predictive maintenance helps extend the life of essential components and boosts the reliability of entire systems. It cuts maintenance expenses, improves operational efficiency, and ensures safety systems are ready to perform when they’re needed most.

What should I consider when choosing safety system components to meet the latest certification standards?

To stay aligned with the upcoming 2025 certification standards, it’s essential to focus on components that meet the latest safety and reliability benchmarks. Here are the key areas to consider:

  • Meeting Updated Standards: Ensure components comply with regulations like CSA C800-2025, which place a strong emphasis on both reliability and safety.
  • Comprehensive Testing: Conduct thorough safety assessments, including detailed validation of critical safety features during acceptance testing.
  • Effective Risk Management: Choose components designed to follow safety management principles, incorporating risk management and safety assurance protocols as outlined by recent FAA regulations.

Focusing on these elements will help maintain system reliability while keeping up with the evolving safety demands in industrial applications.

How are AI and IoT innovations improving the reliability of industrial safety systems?

Advances in AI and IoT are reshaping industrial safety systems by enabling real-time monitoring, smarter analytics, and automated risk management. These technologies are making workplaces safer by spotting potential problems early, avoiding equipment breakdowns, and minimizing hazards on the job.

Some standout developments include AI-powered predictive maintenance, which predicts and addresses equipment wear before it causes downtime, and IoT-connected smart sensors, which provide constant feedback to enhance both safety and operational efficiency. Together, these tools are helping industries create safer and more reliable environments, setting the stage for even better results as we move into 2025 and beyond.

Related posts

 

Back to blog